Rubidium dating

26-Sep-2017 12:27

The similarities between the two tales are so remarkable that we cannot write them off in good conscience as mere coincidences.In the earlier flood legend, Utnapishtim receives instructions and exact dimensions on how to construct a large ship to avoid an imminent flood (as does Noah in Genesis -16), takes animals and his family aboard to preserve life on earth (as does Noah in Genesis -7:1), lands the ship on a mountain after the flood has stopped (as does Noah in Genesis 8:4), releases a dove and a raven from the ship in order to aid his search for dry land (as does Noah in Genesis 8:6-11), and burns a sacrifice after the flood for the gods who find its odor pleasing (as does Noah in Genesis -21).

The author clearly tells the story from the perspective that God had just recently realized the way the world had become.This unnecessary and foreseeable correction is hardly the logical course of action for an omnipotent god to take.If you let your inhibitions loose, however, it should be painfully obvious that the original authors of Genesis didnt consider these salient points as they were writing.If this was the case, why do we now possess their journals made before, during, and after this global deluge?

The flood would have certainly destroyed these societal accounts if God were truly guilty of genocide.

This, too, fails to make sense because biblical authors repeatedly claim that God is omniscient.